I must say that I was quite transfixed with the recent Hyperfiction assignment. The vehicles for the hyperfiction looked like any other web-site, yet it was strategically linked and worked to be a fragmented story that the reader must piece together. Some pages bring you back to familiar pages, some pages take you to paragraphs you've never seen, others seem to be a dead end. Hyperlink fiction is a colorful, technological twist on literature, fragmenting and interweaving a story for the audience.
Reading this hyperfiction, in all its colors and links, made me think of the fragmentation that seems to parallel with it in today's culture. On Facebook and Twitter, we take the fragmented stories of our friends and followers, and create a story depicting their lives. Sometimes there are multiple players within the story (for example, a couple on Facebook has recently separated and are constantly updating on their progressions through a tough break-up). You can watch two sides of a story unfold all at once. Or, like "Charmin Cleary", multiple characters address a single issue that most characters don't really know much about. Similarly, large events can unfold on Facebook, where anyone can post their feelings or contribute to the discussion.
Simply put, Hyperfiction is an extension of the many fragmented and twisted stories similar to the Facebook and Twitter culture. Clive Thompson, a journalist for The New York Times, suggest in his article Brave New World of Digital Intimacy that fragmented stories can create a novel. "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends’ and family members’ lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting." Could this be the basis of Hyperfiction? Every little piece is mundane and insignficant, yet in a whole, creates a portrait of a meaningful story? Hyperfiction, along with up-to-the-minute updating services such as Facebook and Twitter, may have brought in a new form of literature and story-telling: the fragmentation of a larger whole, the incorporation of the pieces into the puzzle.
—Lindsey V
You talk about the wonder of various little "snippets" contributing to a greater story, and Clive Thompson seems to think it a "brave new world". The truth is, this has been around for some time - H.P. Lovecraft and his followers did it in the early nineteen hundreds with the Cthulu mythos, Dungeons & Dragons has been doing since 1974, graphic novels have done it for as long as there have been graphic novels, and if you really want to get down to it this is exactly the concept that defines world history.
ReplyDeleteI'm not trying to put down your thoughts, mind - rather I'm offering a new one: is there a connection? A connection between the fact that this "style", if you will, has been around for some time, and yet only recently has it become evident in mainstream media? I really can't say how relevant this might be, but it's an interesting thought to consider, don't you think?